I have been writing about many facets related to Covid-19 over many months on this blog. My primary focus has been on the financial havoc reaped upon people - reaped because some are reaping the benefits from other's misery. My personal journey on Covid-19 was from taking this very seriously before the World Health Organisation declared it a pandemic, to buying vitamins, nebulisers, to quickly realising that it wasn't about a virus. I could quite confidently state I had suspicions once I started looking at the WHO official data - it didn't make sense from a data modelling perspective. Data modelling may not be the smoking gun in everybody's eyes, but it was at that point I really started reading into the science. Here are some of my initial and developing observations;
- Credible experts in a range of fields (microbiology, virology, immunology, epidemiology) were getting censored and deplatformed for holding views outside of the WHO's narrative. Professor Dolores Cahill springs to mind and Dr Michael Yeadon.
- Logical inconsistencies - why if masks were to prove so vital in stopping the spread, were Asian countries so affected by previous pandemics?
- Why was the source of the pandemic so important? If it had been an accidental leak from a Category 4 laboratory, could we just not acknowledge it rather than have the media spread this nonsense Bat infection Wuhan wet market nonsense?
- Why were many people advocating the benefits of good health and vitamins being shut down?
- Why was their an obsession over vaccines? Admittedly, more old people take the influenza vaccination, but their efficacy, as put on the CDC website can range between 10-50% over the last 10 years.
- Why did the UK government lock down so intensely when we had leading data from countries such as Italy and Spain clear lockdowns weren't working?
- Why, when the "curve" flattened in May/June did we keep the fear going over the summer and then merge flu statistics in the Autumn?
- Why did nobody look at the low previous Autumn flu season as simply being the catch-up factor? That means, because we had a lower number of flu deaths affecting vulnerable people in Autumn/Winter 2019, this was the peak in March from Covid-19.
- Why did nobody identify that Lombardo (Italy), Wuhan (China) and New York (United States) are heavily polluted regions and have a higher incidence of respiratory conditions?
- Why has the media been so selective on what it publishes and use many disinformation approaches, logical fallacies, as I cover in my Bitchute video here?
- Why, when masks are well cited to be the opposite of helpful are they mandated? Some claimed it was to get people out shopping again. Others claimed it was deliberate to help spread the virus further. Many useful idiots claimed masks help and they are wearing them to protect others when indeed they were just hoping others would wear masks to protect them.
- Why are credible analysts and experts not having their findings championed? Ivor Cummings explained the exact reasons why we have standard flu season death rates. Even this 2nd wave in the US is simply a natural phenomenon of latitude.
The end of this article contains a number of lists, studies, articles on masks which you should look into.
Some thoughts on the pandemic and where society is heading
The lack of ability to think critically and examine evidence
One of the huge challenges with something as significant as this pandemic is the range of complexity associated with it. I happen to be fortunate enough to have a BSc Hons and spent most of my career working in data and developing information systems in Health, Education, Finance and Science. The strange thing is we have been conditioned to believing in experts. If a government/SAGE expert says something on BBC news - the majority just accept it.
Indeed, it has taken me a lot of time to read over many papers, studies, datasets, articles - both for and against masks for example. One of the more curious features I found, when reading papers on the isolation of the SARS-COV2 virus, was how significant conjecture was placed into elements of the articles. This may be a moot point, but it then brings into a lot of questions around peer reviews.
A major theme is to "trust the science". We learn that there is significant, well established science around pandemics, disease control, disease mitigation and yet we threw it all away for a global response. The majority of idiots I speak with can't wrap their heads around these basic facts. They seem happy to be spoon-fed the drivel served up in any government sponsored Coronavirus section which has been prevalent throughout this pandemic.
An inability of more aware people to mobilise
A major feature for me is the only place any real dialogue is occurring on the abhorrent Orwellian response by government has been Twitter. It hasn't been easy, and Twitter is not a good means of establishing truth. There has been some good websites put out, and some of the more mainstream scientists and medical experts have managed to avoid being deplatformed - for now. Big business, pharma, government, and media have a huge head start on the average citizen.
I am working on completing my property platform which, the underlying technology I am repurposing for a new website. The idea is it will capture data on significant events around the economy and the pandemic to make this data easy to access and be verifiable. Developing software does take time but it is close to a working version.
Many are finding alternative media targets for their angst but this often simply diffuses the efforts and reduces the impact.
Rabbits in headlights syndrome - why can't people look ahead and act defensively
The moment the lockdown was announced, I knew it would last for at least 6 months. I made a bet and have made subsequent bets that despite Covid-19 not being prevalent in school children - we would see masks in schools. Those who could have spent some time learning about the scientific elements of the pandemic, or read real studies on masks, or sought out more educated experts - chose not to. They chose to bury their heads in the sand.
The real sad reality is the virus is only part of the part of the problem.
The role of intellect, democracy, Intelligence Quotient on the ability to subvert
Take a look at the chart below. We will tend to find that politicians, scientists, and economists will fall into the upper tiles of the IQ distribution curve. Those who are intelligent are damned because politicians have a huge ability to convince the remainder of the population. Those who are not as intelligent, or unable to assimilate and analyse information are relying upon the integrity and professionalism of those above their IQ. This has a profound effect upon the relevancy of democracy. It means political forces and the media only have to convince a fair percentage of people with simple constructs and they can use "the will of the people" against them.
The Economy - the smoking gun almost nobody understands
If we look at the many major shocks to the economy we have experienced - we would assume it was these events which caused the reaction to typically issue more debt or print more money as it is affectionately termed. That we are all bound by the rules of the system to work for our money whilst a chosen few can simply command new money escapes almost everybody.
If we can imagine that - for one, the tail never wags the dog we can elucidate what has really been happening with our financial system. I have written about this many times on this blog, I myself am not an expert in this but would probably beat most hands down on this. We hear of the evils of the fractional reserve banking system (FRBS) - the fiat based monetary system, but indeed it is not a bad system. Fractional Reserve Banking is a perfectly sensible way to run the economy if everybody acts responsibly but they don't and can't.
Please research this for yourself but I want you to look at this chart below. Instead of simply thinking that governments (central banks actually) had to print more money, instead consider that the financial system needed more money to be printed as a function of that system?
People have not woken up to the economical changes we are being put through
I recommend following the excellent Simon Dixon. Most fundamental ways of life will be permanently changed following this lockdown unless we really take action. We know that the goal is to minimise human interaction in our working and private lives, and once we look at the data there is minimal to no evidence that lockdowns work.
Going back to the critical thinking side of things, we can see that the response to the sars-cov2 pandemic has been disproportionate to the levels of risk. We know that governments have never really cared about older people, and we can see the many excess deaths external to covid-19 for cancer, suicides and other conditions due to government overly focusing on covid.
We are going through a financial reset, and we will see centrally issued digital currencies. I can see dramatically reduced freedoms in terms of movements and can go as far as to state this general lax approach to electrical scooters, masks on planes is all designed to reduce the range we travel. We see lockdowns of immense draconian proportions in France, Germany and many other countries.
The result will be communism/socialism and only then will people really understand what has been put upon them.
General government guidance on small businesses
Money supply has to exponentially increase to keep the fiat monetary system working. At certain points, huge injections of liquidity are needed. These liquidity crises are indeed the major events we have experienced.
It is becoming more known throughout the alternative financial press, that this entire Covid-19 pandemic is indeed a scamdemic. We have long passed the concept of a real economy and shutting it down whilst more money is put on the central bank's balance sheets is perfectly acceptable.
I wrote a metaphorical post explaining how we can think about our corrupt financial system.
Background reading and links relating to coronavirus
I have been curating a list of studies, articles and links. Most of them point towards the evidence against the lockdowns, dampen the significance of coronavirus, destroy the mask narrative, but feel free to do your own reading and form your own conclusions.
I would like to thank for you reading this.
Non covid deaths vs uk
Article on psychological effects of masks
Does lockdowns work?
Extensive studies into coronavirus - Michael levitt
Masks articles which are bullshit populist affairs.
Doctor Demonstrates What Happens When You Wear Different Masks - really?
Masks and oxygen intake
False positives and testing.
Michael Yeadon - On masks
Study he mentions....
2015 Vietnam study....
Flu Vaccines work?
Dr. Yeadon is an Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert, developed out of deep knowledge of biology & therapeutics and is an innovative drug discoverer with 23y in the pharmaceutical industry. He trained as a biochemist and pharmacologist, obtaining his PhD from the University of Surrey (UK) in 1988 on the CNS and peripheral pharmacology of opioids on respiration. Dr Yeadon then worked at the Wellcome Research Labs with Salvador Moncada with a research focus on airway hyper-responsiveness and effects of pollutants including ozone and working in drug discovery of 5-LO, COX, PAF, NO and lung inflammation. With colleagues, he was the first to detect exhaled NO in animals and later to induce NOS in lung via allergic triggers. Joining Pfizer in 1995, he was responsible for the growth and portfolio delivery of the Allergy & Respiratory pipeline within the company. During his tenure at Pfizer, Dr Yeadon was responsible for target selection and the progress into humans of new molecules, leading teams of up to 200 staff across all disciplines and won an Achievement Award for productivity in 2008. Under his leadership the research unit invented oral and inhaled NCEs which delivered multiple positive clinical proofs of concept in asthma, allergic rhinitis and COPD. He led productive collaborations such as with Rigel Pharmaceuticals (SYK inhibitors) and was involved in the licensing of Spiriva® and acquisition of the Meridica (inhaler device) company. Dr Yeadon has published over 40 original research articles and now consults and partners with a number of biotechnology companies. Before working with Apellis, Dr Yeadon was VP and Chief Scientific Officer (Allergy & Respiratory Research) with Pfizer.
Who guidance against lockdowns in pandemics
CDC guidance on masks - to wear them…
Articles on masks...
James dellingpople article...
Brief overview and history of viruses
Site with a lot. Of data on viruses...
Mask study retracted….
Case fatality rate vs infection fatality rate.
Article by the daily mail... On masks.
An extremely long article and buried deep inside it is the admission that masks doesn't stop viruses like covid-19.
"Which? said reusable fabric face coverings are not designed to block ultra-fine particles such as Covid-19 like a higher-grade medical respirator mask would."
So why the fuck are government making people wear masks?
The article is discussing mask efficacy against bacterial infections yet fails to refer to the harmful studies, and doesn't make the point that the government is making people wear masks against their will when there is no protection against viruses.
Scotland mandating masks in secondary schools... Monday 1st Novem